Bug #817
puppet classe names and ambiguity
| Status: | Closed | Start: | 04/01/2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assigned to: |  Ohad Levy |
% Done: | 100% |
|
| Category: | Web Interface | |||
| Target version: | 0.3 | |||
| Backlog: | No | Difficulity: | ||
| Votes: | 0 |
Description
When you have a puppet class which is a simple name (basenode, for example) and you also have classes with scoping (ntp::ntp, for example) there is no distinction in the puppet class list between these two. The plus sign shows the same for both. When you actually click on the plus sign, it shows in the list of active classes in the correct way, but until you click on the plus sign, you can't tell the difference.
Associated revisions
Revision 67459a134135ce555c3b7b871a4417b49133f329
fixes #817 - puppet classe names and ambiguity
History
Updated by Ohad Levy about 1 year ago
- Status changed from New to Duplicate
Updated by Ohad Levy about 1 year ago
- Status changed from Duplicate to New
flagged the wrong ticket, sorry about that..
Updated by Ohad Levy about 1 year ago
- Status changed from New to Feedback
so you would like always to see the full class name?
any other ideas of how to represent that?
Updated by Ohad Levy about 1 year ago
David Bristow wrote:
It should say "+ name1" or "+ name1::name2"
not sure I follow, lets say you have ntp, ntp::ntp and ntp::disable classes
do you want to see?
+ ntp + ntp::ntp + ntp::disable
Updated by Ohad Levy about 1 year ago
- Category set to Web Interface
- Status changed from Feedback to New
- Target version set to 0.3
Updated by Ohad Levy about 1 year ago
- Assigned to set to Ohad Levy
Updated by Ohad Levy about 1 year ago
- Status changed from New to Ready For Testing
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Applied in changeset 67459a134135ce555c3b7b871a4417b49133f329.
Updated by Ohad Levy about 1 year ago
- Status changed from Ready For Testing to Closed
